Britain’s role in democracy

Britain cannot defend democracy in the world. Involving Britain in geopolitical conflicts in the China Sea, Indian Ocean, Black Sea and the Middle East could reduce the country’s diplomatic power and Plunge Britain and the world into an arms race like the Cold War. Britain only needs to build a collaborative partnership to defend human rights and democracy, not against the totalitarian alone. Britain cannot play the role of the United States.


At the beginning of the article, we want to examine the mean of democracy.

The term democracy drove from the Greek. Democratic, which has been coined from demos(people) and Kratos( rule) in the middle of the 5th century BCE(before the common era), denote the political systems then existing in some Greek city-states, notably Athens.


There are several definitions of the meaning of democracy that we will point to few samples of the descriptions below:

1- a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting.

2- a country ruled by democracy

3- an organization or situation in which everyone is treated equally and has equal rights.

4- a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.


1-Norway(9.81) 2- Iceland(9.58) 3- Sweden(9.39) 4-New Zealand(9.26) 5- Finland(9.25) 6- Ireland(9.24) 7- Canada(9.22) 8- Denmark(9.22) 9- Australia( 9.09) 10- Switzerland(9.03)

The U.S scored 7.92 in 2020 and again landed in the “flawed democracy” category, where it has resided since falling from “full democracy” in 2016.



Denmark is a democracy and a monarchy at the same time. But it is a constitutional monarchy, which means that the constitutional act limits the monarch’s power.


The system of this government is a constitutional monarchy and a parliament democracy.

United States:

The United States is a representative democracy .because most decisions are made not by the people themselves but by representatives who act on the people’s behalf. It is also an electoral democracy .because the head of government is also the head of state and leader of the executive branch, and constitutional democracy because its fundamental principles and laws are guided by a constitution (which some argue makes the U.S. a republic rather than a democracy).


Parliament grew out of councils that were called by kings to redress grievances and to exercise judicial functions. In time, parliament began to deal with important matters of state, notably the raising of revenues needed to support the policies and decisions of the monarch.

By the end of the 15th century, the English system displayed some of the basic features of modern parliamentary government. For example, the enactment of laws now required the passage of bills by both houses of parliament and the formal approval of the monarch.

The monarchy dominated England’s political life for centuries after the middle ages.


There is democracy in today’s England. In the U.K., there are too many people to ask and too many decisions to make. Therefore representatives are elected to make decisions. Representatives include members of parliament (MPs), members of the Scottish parliament ( MSPs) (representing the population living in Scotland) and local councils. Members of parliament are elected every five years at a general election.

We knew that Britain was a democratic country. But the question is why this country cannot play the role of a supporter of democracy and human rights in the world like the United States. in the following article, and we will answer this question.


Many critical global organizations in the U.S. can play a significant role in democracy, from the United Nations to the security council and UNESCO, etc., which can play an essential role in global democracy.

The phenomenon of democratization has had a marked impact on the United Nations. Just as newly independent states turned to the United Nations for support during the era of decolonization.

Following another wave of accession to statehood and political independence, Member States are turning to the United Nations for support in democratization. The peacekeeping mandates entrusted to the United Nations now often include the restoration of democracy and protection of human rights. United Nations departments, agencies and programmes have been called on to help states draft constitutions, create independent systems, provide police forces, politicize military establishments and establish national institutions for human rights.

They also have been asked by many states engaged in democratization to help encourage and facilitate the active participation of citizens in the political process and to foster the emergence of a productive civil society, including responsible and independent communications media.


The U.N. security council is the premier global body for maintaining international peace and security.

The U.N. security council fosters negotiations, imposes sanctions, and authorizes force, including the deployment of peacekeeping missions.

Examining these two organizations as examples of influential organizations in promoting global democracy shows that the U.S. can play a vital role in building and promoting democracy and human rights worldwide.

The question that arises is whether Britain, like the U.S., can play an essential and constructive role in spreading human rights and democracy worldwide?

The answer to this question is that because Britain, like the U.S., does not have the necessary organization to establish and promote democracy and human rights globally, it cannot promote global democracy as the U.S.

Another important reason could be that the country has not presented a clear policy to the world because of its dichotomy in the values of human rights and democracy. Among the contradictory policies of this country are discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities, unjust distribution of power and wealth, violence against women and children, etc. As a result, despite these reasons, it can be said that Britain’s involvement in geopolitical conflicts in the China Sea, the Indian Ocean, the Black Sea and the Middle East could reduce its diplomatic power and plunge Britain and the world into an arms race like the Cold War. This country cannot take on the role of the united states.


As stated in the text of the article, there are important institutions, including the United Nations .it can play a vital role as a powerful country in democracy and human rights.
The involvement of other countries, including the U.K., in human matters can only exacerbate the situation because it lacks the legal tools and enforcement guarantees necessary to restore human rights and democracy.

Latest news

Related news


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here