UK Plans to Accommodate Asylum Seekers in Military Bases

The UK’s plans to house asylum seekers in military bases are severe. To reduce its costs, the UK wants to accommodate asylum seekers in military bases and remove them from hotels. The UK government has put a new plan for the accommodation of asylum seekers on the agenda, based on which military bases and ships are considered for a total of asylum seekers instead of hotels. All the refugees’ essential life needs must be met in these new residences. The UK government has announced that the goal is to save money and stimulate tourism.

Accommodation of refugees in military bases

The UK plans to house asylum seekers in military bases will likely be implemented in the coming days. In this way, to reduce costs, the UK plans to house thousands of refugees in military bases in the future and is also considering ships as accommodation options. Robert Jenrick, an official in the British Parliament, said that the accommodation of migrants in hotels has led to a decrease in tourism, cancellation of weddings and other losses. Jenrick emphasized that the new capacity should meet the basic needs of the refugees and no more.

British legal tools against immigrants

The UK houses thousands of asylum seekers in ex-military bases where the UK is trying to use all its legal tools in immigration. The British Conservative government wants to use all its power against immigrants. A recent controversial law stipulates that anyone who enters the country irregularly must be detained for weeks and then deported to Rwanda or other countries. These asylum seekers should also be denied the right to apply for asylum. UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak even rejects making exceptions for children.

UK’s strict rules for refugees

The UK’s plans to house asylum seekers in military bases are rigorous. This new law provides up to one month of detention for all people who enter the UK without permission, regardless of their background. They are then deported to their homeland or, if it is too dangerous, to Rwanda or another country. According to these strict rules, the right to apply for asylum should also be taken from them. The UK housing thousands of asylum seekers in ex-military bases has brought criticism.

Global criticism against the UK asylum plan

UK to house thousands of asylum seekers in ex-military bases has caused global Criticism. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights have strongly criticized this project. The Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe has asked the UK to respect its international obligations towards asylum seekers. The UNHCR has also criticized the UK asylum plan and considered it a violation of international law.

The need for the UK to respect international laws

From the point of view of many, The UK’s plans to house asylum seekers in military bases are against human rights. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Dunja Mijatovic has called on British MPs to respect international obligations towards asylum seekers. She said, “It is essential that parliamentarians prevent legislation incompatible with the United Kingdom’s international obligations from being passed.”

United Nations Criticism of the UK asylum plan

The UK housing thousands of asylum seekers in ex-military bases has also caused Criticism from the UN. The UN refugee agency now fears that this could set a global precedent. Vicky Tennant, the UK representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, told Sky News: “It goes against the UK’s obligations under the International Refugee Convention.”

UK’s controversial refugee deal with Rwanda

The UK asylum plan was first proposed during the Boris Johnson era. Under former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, a controversial refugee resettlement deal was signed with Rwanda in East Africa, which was supposed to discourage people from crossing the English Channel. For years, London has been trying to prevent the illegal and often dangerous entry of migrants through the English Channel. Due to leaving the EU, the UK no longer has any readmission agreements with EU countries.

The failure of the UK agreement with Rwanda

The implementation of the UK refugee agreement with Rwanda has so far failed. A flight carrying migrants to the East African country, scheduled for June 2022, was cancelled at short notice following a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights. In December, the High Court in London then ruled that the deportation to Rwanda was legal. The British Conservative government wants to discourage asylum seekers from crossing the English Channel to the UK in small boats.

The determination of the UK government to deport refugees

The UK plans to house asylum seekers in military bases show the determination of the UK government to deal with asylum seekers. However, the UK government has announced plans to deport unwanted migrants to Rwanda and other countries, even if the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) bans it in the short term. In this way, the UK government has put stringent laws against asylum seekers on the agenda. Despite the high Criticism and violations of international laws, it has announced that it is determined to implement these laws and will not allow them to stop.

Violation of the European Convention on Human Rights by the UK

The UK housing thousands of asylum seekers on ex-military bases violates the European Convention on Human Rights. Under the strict new rules, almost all migrants who enter the UK illegally must be detained in accommodations such as former military bases or student hostels and then deported to Rwanda or other countries. These plans can violate the European Convention on Human Rights.

Limiting immigration is Rishi Sunak’s foreign policy priority.

Limiting immigration and maintaining border control was one of the central promises of Brexit. UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made this one of his policy priorities. The English Channel between France and UK is one of the most dangerous waterways in the world. Despite this, more than 45,000 men, women and children crossed the canal last year alone. They usually come from Albania, Afghanistan or Syria, hoping for a safer and better life in the UK.

Conservative exaggeration on the issue of refugees

The UK Conservative government is under pressure from several quarters. For some conservative groups, the bill is not enough. They want, among other things that the European Court of Human Rights should not be allowed to exercise any jurisdiction over the planned law. Another group wants to create legal channels for asylum seekers. Opponents reject this bill. Critics accuse the government of exaggerating the problem to please conservative voters. In the UK, significantly fewer asylum applications are made from Germany.